Видео

That potential is about to turn into kinetic.

1:56 Using information as building blocks 4:00

Q: What Happens If You Jump Into A Black Hole? A: You get the world record in jumping.

My question is what are we inflating or expanding into in the first place?

Inside outside your thinking of a human aspect of the whole of situation

plot twist.. it actually is just a universe of photons only. matter is merely a type of hologram

Very stimulating

Very interesting, love that they referred to the Silurians in the name, great DW reference 😊

Your body will be compressed into this blackhole matter. What a great way to die.

Financially weak.

Would duplicating a quantum bit be acceptable if some universal thing made 100% sure to delete exactly and only 1 of them such that the clones never interact with the same system?

Hey so if a black hole sucks in regular items and bleeds out quantum information, would the opposite be true for a white hole? Where a white hole can only form using quantum information and bleeds out regular items? That makes me think that at the boundary where the two meet, is the only thing allowed to cross between them just quantum information? And is quantum information essentially just wave functions waiting for an excitation to trigger the creation of random virtual particles???

Doesn't her time slow as she mooves closer to the Singularity?

Does dark matter effect time time/space the same way gravity does? This may seem like a silly question. It obviously curves time and space but I didn't know how uniformly it was dispersed. Can it condense like normal matter does. Does it attract itself to itself? Do we know much matter is equal to dark matter as far as gravity goes? For example if the was a bucket of, lets say hydrogen (that's pretty common), how much dark matter would be equal to it as far as gravity goes? 7? 7 Trillion? If anyone knows the answer to any of these questions I would appreciate the input. If the question is a nonstarter to begin with let me know as well.

I would love for PBS Space Time to do an episode dedicated to Outer Wilds. A game full of macroscopic quantum mechanics, a planet’s core black hole, and a nomadic science-loving species.

WE Definitely can and will in the near future take over our solar system. But interstellar travel is at least 500 to 1000 years ahead of our time

It's been some years since I really spent a lot of time thinking about these type things. But what from I could gather here, it seems like there might not be much if any "collapse" from a quark star once it "gets too heavy" and becomes a "Black hole" it would simply be the event horizon would simply grow past the surface of the star and the star itself really doesn't change much. If could "magic snap your fingers" and see through the event horizon, you would just see a neutron star like object below, or whatever a pure quark star would look like. From the outside, there should be not much way to tell if the neutron star is a singularity or is just a neutron star 1" below the event horizon.

Soooooooo.... our universe is a simulation and we are all hapless three-dimensional puppets on strings of time pulled by nameless higher dimensional forces? And our existence is projected into space-time like the way a projector casts an illusion of a 3D world onto a 2D surface? I'm going with that until physics proves it wrong.

I'm just putting this out there. They exist. My people have been using them for centuries.

So at the instance of crossing the event horizon (feet first) -- for a moment you wouldn't feel your feet?

One guy standing there endlessly talking what if... next

Michelson et al were not stupid to believe in the Aether, but they missed a few details.They expected the Luminous Aether to be something stationary that the Earth was ploughing its way through. They expected something through which light and the other EMs would propagate at the speed of light. They probably never wondered what kind of matter it was. The Quintescent Aether is a very different explanation. It's state of matter, the fifth state, lacks the construct of normal matter and is therefore massless. The physical properties are more important than its chemical properties. The QA has ab energy / matter relationship that establishes how it move at c., the so called speed of light. It may make sense that photons do not propel themselves, they simply energize the Quintescent Aether that is already moving at that speed. When recirculating QA encounters itself at a sidereal 2c, there is no interaction and no resistance. Everything that moves at c moves at the same c, which is locally zero relative to the QA. The Q Aether slows as it encounters normal matter because it is rendering energy to that normal matter, maintaining the speed of all the subatomic particles in the normal matter. If the subatomics are all moving at c but not in a straight line, then, they are all accelerating. This acceleration can be perfectly internally balanced until a gradient in time dilation causes the local subatomics an imbalance of accelerations. Call it momentum, inertia or gravity, it is the interaction of the Quintescent Aether with every speck of normal matter. This interaction explains all of the "action at a distance" phenomena. Thanks for a good video.

Just wonder if the inside of a bh is essentially a separate space time. Waiting for the next video

The most fascinating thing i took from this is most of our technology and industry today has a similar impact on the earth as natural catastrophic events. That says a lot about how we are choosing to go about things.

i love that the age old tale of Alice and Bob has finally become a tale of star-crossed lovers. also can someone reexplain to me why Alice still sees a black surface below her after she crosses the event horizon? is it because that black surface is actually the point after which no photons are able to reach her, and since she's now falling into the black hole at tremendous speeds she's catching up to them as she falls, so the point at which they can't reach her anymore is always getting farther down? but if that's the case why does the blackness also move "up" to fish eye the universe behind her?

If u compare the fresh face of the presenter in this old video with his face and forehead now, you will see a deep well in his forhead and many lines surrounding it, and the wear and tear of time and especially stress on it. It's a pity that no matter what the reference frame, people get wrecked by the stresses of life in relative ways as well.

There was no Big Bang..... There was a big sound vibration!!

You die.... The end 😂

I don’t think you’re describing a rotating black hole. Probably all black holes rotate

Isn’t knowledge of absence of particles just as valuable as knowledge of there being particles in a vacuum? We have to store both information sets

Does NASA have any plans to send a floating probe to Venus? I'd rather wait to see how that works out before getting too excited, but it is interesting. I just hope I love long enough to see a colony somewhere, whether it be the Moon, Mars, or Venus, or even an asteroid mining operation.

Hmm. Maybe there IS an afterlife.

Yeah, but Bob was asleep. I can't sleep for a week.

"your butt ticks faster than your head" but that’s from the frame of reference of your butt, not your head, so I feel like the saying "your butt ticks slower than your head" makes more sense.

Alpha Centuri could go supernovical & all we would experience is the bright light. Facts.

Man when I went to school, they said there was three states, solid liquid and gas , then I remember when plasma came along , but when did all the other states become know ?

did the pins sell out already? I need one of those pins

I did it!!!!! I worked out how to map Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle onto the atom. We can consider the electron as a vector, it has a magnitude and direction, the exact same properties used to measure momentum. The electron can move in any direction all around the centre, and it has a magnitude, an excited electron will be found further away from the centre, and a more stable one will be closer to the centre. So we can see there should be perfect mathematical symmetry between the electron and momentum. In fact, it could be helpful to think of the electron as the force carrier particle for momentum. In the current model, the electrons appear to be stuck on ridges, discrete intervals of distance away from the atomic nuclei, today physicists call these levels of excitement. In my model, the wave function exists as a real physical entity exerting an actual force. electrons form due to the wave function reaching its maximum or minimum value which coincidentally happens at these discrete distances, causing a perturbation in spacetime, these are called virtual particles, and we have seen other examples of virtual particles that act strangely like electrons, popping in and out of existence. the electron is the force carrier particle for the wave function. Which means the wave function is the fifth fundamental force, which means it has a field, which is somewhat intuitive because no matter the size of the object, it always has some amount of wobble as it moves. All objects have to follow a wave function, including you and I when we walk. Location has mathematical congruence with the nucleus. It has a constant wobble, thus keeping the absolute location an unknown. Momentum, then, has translation symmetry with the electron, with the electron particles following along the wave function. Since Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states if we know location, we cannot know the momentum, and vice versa. We can map the electron perfectly onto the wave function, without fully knowing either one. Since these have absolute mathematical congruence, the electron is pulling the nucleus in some sort of Heisenberg's tug-of-war, so we'll say. However, we need to first map Schrodinger's equation onto a sphere, using 3D trigonometry and differential equations. We've established that the electron is the force carrier particle for the wave function, or wave force. In the new model, each atom has exactly two electrons, or an electron pair, which create equal amplitudes in opposing directions, thus resulting in the wave function as described in Schrodinger's equations. This is another amazing coincidence, as all atoms have even numbers of electrons. When, in reality, they have exactly 2 opposing electrons that follow the wave function, reforming continuously at the highs and lows of the wave function. The momentum of the electron makes the nucleus lag behind, giving the increased distances seen for excited particles, and why we see discrete levels, or ridges. The drawing of the atom will change, it will now look something more like a horse and carriage, with the nucleus being pulled by the two electrons. The faster the horse (the electron), the longer the rope that tethers the nucleus to them. This is also a convenient coincidence, that momentum itself would lead to higher excitement levels for the force carrier particle of momentum (defined by the wave function). Prediction 1: We will have a formula which can precisely tell us when and where an electron will form by wrapping Schrodinger's equation around the equator of the atom. Prediction 2: The wave function is the fifth fundamental force, it has an associated field, and the electron is the force carrier particle for it. Prediction 3: We can catch an electron. Increasing its pressure using magnets or light will increase its wobble, which will give us unlimited green energy. Squeezing a single electron can result in a flood of baryons, exotic particles, and complex particles. Prediction 4: The electron itself is the force carrier particle for the wave function. So, if we get enough electrons and energise them to all face the same direction, we can travel at relativistic speeds, or possibly faster than light. In fact, the double slit experiment shows the wave function itself is FTL. Prediction 5: that wherever a wave function exists, the weak nuclear force will be exerting effort on the particle in question, since we can see the electron being exchanged between quarks. I can show, that the wave function FORCE is what is actually keeping the quarks at the exact distances. This means there is no weak nuclear force, but instead baryon decay occurs by the 'weak nuclear potential energy', the same energy we'll be farming from the electron pressure chambers. This means we have something to test, and since it is testable, we have already fulfilled one the requirements of proof of concept. Data analyses on the perturbations in other particles, such as the photon, caused by a 3D Schrodinger's equation could indicate whether we have stumbled upon a monumental jackpot and wealth of understanding in physics. If someone maps the Schrodinger equation onto a 3D plane along the equator (this allows for directionally opposing electrons), then maps the already known 'excitement levels' from the older model onto the maximums and minimums of the wave function from my new model, then this is will become proof of a working concept. I'm leaving this comment here, knowing full well, when that happens, I will have hard evidence to point to, showing I am the first to solve for the atom using the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. award me the appropriate accolades as you must, Nobel prize notwithstanding. Duncan McKay . DOB 24/12/1987

Maybe thats why photons experience duality when measured in time vs not measured at all.

Not sure whether it's been mentioned but Colombus didn't go around the earth, he thought he had arrived to India but he didn't. This didn't happen until Magellan a few decades later.

My opinion on string theory and the asdf coorospondence or whatever. Is that if you work a theory for long enough. Regardless if what that theory is. It'll inevitably come to represent reality. *Because thats the whole point of making a theory* So string theory isnt right but it should still be worked on because something useful will inevitably come out of it. If they work long enough

The fact that may be limited in how far humans can travel may be good for the universe as whole.

When the mind fries at the black hole concept. Wich is where modern physics is at

What if its all much simpler?? Black holes just have super big and dense neutron stars inside and entanglement is just like Einstein said.. a pair of gloves.

GR and PBS say Pancakification. QM says Pancakification and Spaghettification at the same time.

Could the white hole be what a mirror image is to us? Smth we can "see and calculate" but never reach because its not really there

Dang this would help gamblers win 100% of the time

Fish. Hahaha. 🐟🐠

I really struggle to understand how you can get the information back with Hawking radiation. Isn't Hawking radiation random apparition of matter on each side of the event horizon that disappears almost instantaneously?

@pbsspacetime can you please address how much into the future of the universe Alice would see if she was looking back? Naively thinking: if for Bob her time slows to a stop, does it mean for her the outside universe time accelerates to infinity and she'll "see" the end of outside universe? Also would the "stacked up", blue shifted photons fry her? :)